Book a Call
Book a Call
Product Development Stages
Enhanced User Experience
ARTICLE #118
Product Development: Product centric vs user-centric approach
Product Development Stages
Enhanced User Experience
Written by:
5 min read
Updated on: October 17, 2024
Samson Mosilily
Senior Regional Manager
African Market, Regional Management, Growth
Samson Mosilily
Senior Regional Manager
African Market, Regional Management, Growth
Every business owner and product manager eventually faces a pivotal choice: Which product development strategy should we follow? Two popular paths often rise to the top—product-centric and user-centric. For years, many companies believed building the “best” product with the “coolest” features was enough to guarantee success. But a fancy feature set means little if your target audience doesn’t actually want or use it.
In truth, these two approaches are two sides of the same coin. One focuses on creating standout products; the other focuses on meeting people’s needs. Here, we’ll explain both methods and see how each shapes product success in its own way.
Every business owner and product manager eventually faces a pivotal choice: Which product development strategy should we follow? Two popular paths often rise to the top—product-centric and user-centric. For years, many companies believed building the “best” product with the “coolest” features was enough to guarantee success. But a fancy feature set means little if your target audience doesn’t actually want or use it.
In truth, these two approaches are two sides of the same coin. One focuses on creating standout products; the other focuses on meeting people’s needs. Here, we’ll explain both methods and see how each shapes product success in its own way.
What is product development?
What is product development?
Product development is how you create and launch new products, starting from that spark of an idea all the way to marketing and release. It can cover a wide range of activities:
Ideation: Where the magic happens—the brainstorming, arguments, and crazy ideas that start to form possible concepts.
Design and prototyping: When the ideas have come to rest, it's time to construct, test, and refine. This is all about refining the designs and making sure the concept translates in the real world.
Market strategy and commercialisation: That's where you determine how to market the thing. That's all about creating the appropriate marketing strategy, pricing the thing, and positioning the product for long-term success.
No matter the form it takes, product development aims to produce something that resonates with customers and stands out in the market.
Product development is how you create and launch new products, starting from that spark of an idea all the way to marketing and release. It can cover a wide range of activities:
Ideation: Where the magic happens—the brainstorming, arguments, and crazy ideas that start to form possible concepts.
Design and prototyping: When the ideas have come to rest, it's time to construct, test, and refine. This is all about refining the designs and making sure the concept translates in the real world.
Market strategy and commercialisation: That's where you determine how to market the thing. That's all about creating the appropriate marketing strategy, pricing the thing, and positioning the product for long-term success.
No matter the form it takes, product development aims to produce something that resonates with customers and stands out in the market.
Product-centric development
Product-centric companies work on the principle of presenting the product that users have not yet realised is needed. As Steve Jobs said, “People don't know what they want until you show it to them.”
What does “Product-Centric” mean?
A product-centric approach revolves around pushing for advanced features, superior performance, and high-end innovation—even if customers haven’t asked for those specifics. The assumption? If you build an amazing product, people will come around and buy it (eventually). In practice, that often means heavy investment in research and development, plus a belief that top-tier tech or advanced design will trump all else.
Pros of a product-centric approach
A product-centric approach focuses on developing products that are technically advanced and feature-rich. It is believed that innovation and quality will naturally attract customers. Here’s a deeper look at the key benefits of this approach:
1. Laser-focused expertise
When you focus on a product-led strategy, your team will immerse themselves in a narrow space and thoroughly dominate it. You will not be sidetracked by external considerations like transient fads or buyer moods. Rather, you will create a product that expresses your team's skill and passion. What this implies is your product will be technically ahead of the competition and exactly customised to its destination. And the outcome will be a product that stands out from the competition, with detail and craftsmanship that the customer can see.
2. Brand reputation through quality
When you excel at making a great product, you lay the groundwork for creating a reputation as a premium brand for quality. This is where the "premium" advantage comes in. Dyson is recognised for its high-end vacuums and hairdryers that are pricier than those of competitors but are well worth the price due to their advanced technology and design. If you concentrate only on making the very best product you can, you establish your brand as the authority on quality, and this will result in customer loyalty in the long term, even if your product is more expensive.
3. Encourages innovative solutions
Product-based companies frequently set out to address problems in innovative ways, without being hamstrung by the need to react to every customer inquiry. Free from the pressure, products can be created that are revolutionary, with groups encouraged to try things, think outside the square, and innovate technically or creatively. Without the pressure to please every user, product-based companies can make genuinely revolutionary products that transform markets or even establish new ones altogether.
4. Clear internal goals
A product-first approach provides your staff with a unifying goal: to create the best product that can be made. This definiteness can be incredibly energising, as all departments—whether R&D, marketing, or whatever—see the bigger picture. With the end goal established, teams move in harmony quickly, increasing productivity and staying in sync. Because the whole company is aligned under one objective (making a breakthrough product), it can condense decision-making, enhance teamwork, and achieve a more efficient and unified development process.
Cons of a product-centric approach
While a product-focused approach may result in revolutionary innovations and high-quality products, it's not without its disadvantages. The following are the major challenges that companies may encounter once they concentrate all their efforts on developing the "perfect" product:
1. Potential market mismatch
Just because you build an amazing product doesn’t mean anyone wants it. Even though it might be packed with features and cutting-edge technology, if the market doesn’t feel the need for it, you’ve got a problem. Sometimes, you might create something that's so advanced it’s ahead of its time, or worse, just not needed at all. The reality is, a technically perfect product can fail to capture attention if the customer demand isn’t there. And no amount of innovation can fix that. It’s a bit like opening a high-end restaurant in a neighbourhood that doesn’t care for fine dining—great food won’t matter if no one’s hungry.
2. Long customer adoption cycles
Even if your product is revolutionary, convincing customers to adopt it can take far longer than expected. You might have to spend enough resources and time educating the market on why they need your product in the first place. This is mainly true when customers are already comfortable with existing solutions and see no immediate need to change. This long education process can drain marketing budgets and stretch timelines, cutting into early profits. Remember, getting consumers to step out of their comfort zone is a slow process, and sometimes it feels like you are just spinning your wheels while the competition capitalises on quicker wins.
3. Higher risk of failure
The possibility of huge returns is obvious. Apple, Dyson, or Tesla are the best examples of what a product-focused strategy can achieve. But there is another side to that coin: the possibility of failure is just as great. Product-focused businesses are basically betting big on the success of their product. They gamble everything on the innovation of their product, putting a lot of money into R&D, manufacturing, and marketing, only to encounter the cruel fact that the market doesn't believe in it. If customers don't take to the product or don't realise its value, all the time, money, and effort can go up in smoke in a matter of time. It's a risk game, and not everybody gets out a victor.
4. Less customer input
Sometimes, relying heavily on this approach can lead to tunnel vision. When your only focus is on creating the perfect product, you will lose sight of the customer’s actual needs and feedback. You will end up making a technically impressive product that doesn’t solve the real problems or pain points users face. You might also overlook the usability, features, or even the basic design. So, no matter how pretty or functional your product is, if it doesn't meet consumer expectations or make their lives better, it's a tough sell.
Product-centric companies work on the principle of presenting the product that users have not yet realised is needed. As Steve Jobs said, “People don't know what they want until you show it to them.”
What does “Product-Centric” mean?
A product-centric approach revolves around pushing for advanced features, superior performance, and high-end innovation—even if customers haven’t asked for those specifics. The assumption? If you build an amazing product, people will come around and buy it (eventually). In practice, that often means heavy investment in research and development, plus a belief that top-tier tech or advanced design will trump all else.
Pros of a product-centric approach
A product-centric approach focuses on developing products that are technically advanced and feature-rich. It is believed that innovation and quality will naturally attract customers. Here’s a deeper look at the key benefits of this approach:
1. Laser-focused expertise
When you focus on a product-led strategy, your team will immerse themselves in a narrow space and thoroughly dominate it. You will not be sidetracked by external considerations like transient fads or buyer moods. Rather, you will create a product that expresses your team's skill and passion. What this implies is your product will be technically ahead of the competition and exactly customised to its destination. And the outcome will be a product that stands out from the competition, with detail and craftsmanship that the customer can see.
2. Brand reputation through quality
When you excel at making a great product, you lay the groundwork for creating a reputation as a premium brand for quality. This is where the "premium" advantage comes in. Dyson is recognised for its high-end vacuums and hairdryers that are pricier than those of competitors but are well worth the price due to their advanced technology and design. If you concentrate only on making the very best product you can, you establish your brand as the authority on quality, and this will result in customer loyalty in the long term, even if your product is more expensive.
3. Encourages innovative solutions
Product-based companies frequently set out to address problems in innovative ways, without being hamstrung by the need to react to every customer inquiry. Free from the pressure, products can be created that are revolutionary, with groups encouraged to try things, think outside the square, and innovate technically or creatively. Without the pressure to please every user, product-based companies can make genuinely revolutionary products that transform markets or even establish new ones altogether.
4. Clear internal goals
A product-first approach provides your staff with a unifying goal: to create the best product that can be made. This definiteness can be incredibly energising, as all departments—whether R&D, marketing, or whatever—see the bigger picture. With the end goal established, teams move in harmony quickly, increasing productivity and staying in sync. Because the whole company is aligned under one objective (making a breakthrough product), it can condense decision-making, enhance teamwork, and achieve a more efficient and unified development process.
Cons of a product-centric approach
While a product-focused approach may result in revolutionary innovations and high-quality products, it's not without its disadvantages. The following are the major challenges that companies may encounter once they concentrate all their efforts on developing the "perfect" product:
1. Potential market mismatch
Just because you build an amazing product doesn’t mean anyone wants it. Even though it might be packed with features and cutting-edge technology, if the market doesn’t feel the need for it, you’ve got a problem. Sometimes, you might create something that's so advanced it’s ahead of its time, or worse, just not needed at all. The reality is, a technically perfect product can fail to capture attention if the customer demand isn’t there. And no amount of innovation can fix that. It’s a bit like opening a high-end restaurant in a neighbourhood that doesn’t care for fine dining—great food won’t matter if no one’s hungry.
2. Long customer adoption cycles
Even if your product is revolutionary, convincing customers to adopt it can take far longer than expected. You might have to spend enough resources and time educating the market on why they need your product in the first place. This is mainly true when customers are already comfortable with existing solutions and see no immediate need to change. This long education process can drain marketing budgets and stretch timelines, cutting into early profits. Remember, getting consumers to step out of their comfort zone is a slow process, and sometimes it feels like you are just spinning your wheels while the competition capitalises on quicker wins.
3. Higher risk of failure
The possibility of huge returns is obvious. Apple, Dyson, or Tesla are the best examples of what a product-focused strategy can achieve. But there is another side to that coin: the possibility of failure is just as great. Product-focused businesses are basically betting big on the success of their product. They gamble everything on the innovation of their product, putting a lot of money into R&D, manufacturing, and marketing, only to encounter the cruel fact that the market doesn't believe in it. If customers don't take to the product or don't realise its value, all the time, money, and effort can go up in smoke in a matter of time. It's a risk game, and not everybody gets out a victor.
4. Less customer input
Sometimes, relying heavily on this approach can lead to tunnel vision. When your only focus is on creating the perfect product, you will lose sight of the customer’s actual needs and feedback. You will end up making a technically impressive product that doesn’t solve the real problems or pain points users face. You might also overlook the usability, features, or even the basic design. So, no matter how pretty or functional your product is, if it doesn't meet consumer expectations or make their lives better, it's a tough sell.
User-centric product development
The user-centric approach articulates the whole customer journey for a great user experience. It aims to keep a keen eye on building customer loyalty and maximising user lifetime value.
What does “User-Centric” mean?
User-centered design puts the user in the middle of decision-making and product design. It also concentrates on establishing strong customer relationships by delivering excellent service and experience and learning users' needs, pain points, and preferences. The main consideration for this approach is the whole experience of the user, such as how intuitive, accessible, and useful the product would be. The aim is to maximise usability and see the product fit smoothly into the user's life as naturally as possible.
Pros of a user-centric approach
A user-centric approach puts the needs of customers at the centre of product development. It ensures you are solving real problems that matter to them. The main benefits include:
1. Immediate market validation
The beauty of the user-centric method is that you are not venturing into the dark. By designing specifically to what your users need, you bypass the guesswork and get running straight away. Because you've already iterated and tested with actual feedback from real people, there's already an existing demand for your product. In effect, you are guaranteeing that the market is ready for your product before you even launch.
2. Long-term customer loyalty
When customers feel heard, they stay. A listening brand, one that shifts and changes to meet the needs of its users, can find a loyal fan base. And loyalty doesn't occur by chance—it's established through repeated, user-initiated enhancements. Through ongoing refinement of your product to address evolving demands, you produce an experience to which customers don't just defer but entrust. It's the distinction between a store you occasionally shop at and a brand you return to again and again—Apple or Spotify, for example. You are not just fixing problems today; you are building the foundation for long-term, changing customer relationships.
3. Clearer roadmap
The best part about user-centric development is that you don't need to guess what's next. Ongoing research and feedback from users give you a map of what feature or enhancement is required next. Rather than using gut instinct or wild guessing during brainstorming, you have a direct line to your customers' changing needs. That translates to clearer priorities, less wasted time on unnecessary features, and a more streamlined development cycle.
4. Higher adoption rates
Products that address genuine pain points are more successful. Why is that? Because the people can immediately see the value. When your product is designed to solve a user's particular issue, they are more likely to embrace it into their lives, sooner. A product that answers user frustrations and simplifies their life will have faster adoption and a solid user base. Individuals do not have to be persuaded into purchasing a product that's specially designed to suit them—it speaks for itself.
Cons of a user-centric approach
Even with so many benefits, it is not an easy ride to become a favourite brand of your customers. Extensive research is needed to find your customers need. A user-centric approach can certainly boost engagement and but it's not without its drawbacks.
1. Resource-heavy research
User-centered development usually means a lot of research to go around—surveys, polls, focus groups, interviews, and constant analytics. Yes, it makes you better at your product, but it won't come cheap. Collecting a lot of data from users, particularly if you're doing something with big numbers, will burn through money fast. All that testing, analysing, and applying the feedback takes time and money. In the end, the cost of continuous research can eat into your product’s profit margins, especially in the early stages when budgets are tight. So, while the user might have all the answers, you’ll need deep pockets to ask the right questions.
2. Possible quality trade-offs
A usual danger of working with a user-focused approach is losing track of the larger picture, specifically, technical superiority and innovation. When you only listen to what users report that they desire, you will be tempted to compromise on issues such as engineering or features. After all, users may value simplicity and ease of use, but they may not always know or value the more sophisticated, innovative features that may differentiate your product. This can lead to a product that's optimally designed for existing user needs but not with the wow-factor or advanced functionality that can make it a market leader. You can end up with something "nice" but not something revolutionary.
3. Time-consuming
Continuous interaction with users seems wonderful in theory, but it's also time-consuming. Gathering feedback, reading responses, and making changes based on what you have learned is a continuous process. And while you wait for users to provide their feedback, you won't be working on new features. In other instances, by the time you do manage to act on feedback, the market has changed, and you are trying to catch up. Wading at the pace of user feedback can at times feel like moving through molasses.
4. Limited space for bold innovation
Here's an idea: if you are continuously listening to what users tell you they need, where is there room for actual innovation? Users are good at telling you what's broken in a product or what would make their life simpler. But they can't always foresee the next big something, and they might not even know what they actually want until they experience it. The greatest innovations—such as the iPhone or the first Dyson vacuum—were not created through customer requests. They were created through visionary, cutting-edge thinking. By only thinking about feedback and customer demands, you run the risk of strangling creativity and not pushing the boundaries with something revolutionary. It's akin to asking someone to create the car of their dreams and then not building anything without an engine—they may not know they want the tech-enabled electric car of tomorrow, but you can be sure they'll adore it when it's in front of them.
The user-centric approach articulates the whole customer journey for a great user experience. It aims to keep a keen eye on building customer loyalty and maximising user lifetime value.
What does “User-Centric” mean?
User-centered design puts the user in the middle of decision-making and product design. It also concentrates on establishing strong customer relationships by delivering excellent service and experience and learning users' needs, pain points, and preferences. The main consideration for this approach is the whole experience of the user, such as how intuitive, accessible, and useful the product would be. The aim is to maximise usability and see the product fit smoothly into the user's life as naturally as possible.
Pros of a user-centric approach
A user-centric approach puts the needs of customers at the centre of product development. It ensures you are solving real problems that matter to them. The main benefits include:
1. Immediate market validation
The beauty of the user-centric method is that you are not venturing into the dark. By designing specifically to what your users need, you bypass the guesswork and get running straight away. Because you've already iterated and tested with actual feedback from real people, there's already an existing demand for your product. In effect, you are guaranteeing that the market is ready for your product before you even launch.
2. Long-term customer loyalty
When customers feel heard, they stay. A listening brand, one that shifts and changes to meet the needs of its users, can find a loyal fan base. And loyalty doesn't occur by chance—it's established through repeated, user-initiated enhancements. Through ongoing refinement of your product to address evolving demands, you produce an experience to which customers don't just defer but entrust. It's the distinction between a store you occasionally shop at and a brand you return to again and again—Apple or Spotify, for example. You are not just fixing problems today; you are building the foundation for long-term, changing customer relationships.
3. Clearer roadmap
The best part about user-centric development is that you don't need to guess what's next. Ongoing research and feedback from users give you a map of what feature or enhancement is required next. Rather than using gut instinct or wild guessing during brainstorming, you have a direct line to your customers' changing needs. That translates to clearer priorities, less wasted time on unnecessary features, and a more streamlined development cycle.
4. Higher adoption rates
Products that address genuine pain points are more successful. Why is that? Because the people can immediately see the value. When your product is designed to solve a user's particular issue, they are more likely to embrace it into their lives, sooner. A product that answers user frustrations and simplifies their life will have faster adoption and a solid user base. Individuals do not have to be persuaded into purchasing a product that's specially designed to suit them—it speaks for itself.
Cons of a user-centric approach
Even with so many benefits, it is not an easy ride to become a favourite brand of your customers. Extensive research is needed to find your customers need. A user-centric approach can certainly boost engagement and but it's not without its drawbacks.
1. Resource-heavy research
User-centered development usually means a lot of research to go around—surveys, polls, focus groups, interviews, and constant analytics. Yes, it makes you better at your product, but it won't come cheap. Collecting a lot of data from users, particularly if you're doing something with big numbers, will burn through money fast. All that testing, analysing, and applying the feedback takes time and money. In the end, the cost of continuous research can eat into your product’s profit margins, especially in the early stages when budgets are tight. So, while the user might have all the answers, you’ll need deep pockets to ask the right questions.
2. Possible quality trade-offs
A usual danger of working with a user-focused approach is losing track of the larger picture, specifically, technical superiority and innovation. When you only listen to what users report that they desire, you will be tempted to compromise on issues such as engineering or features. After all, users may value simplicity and ease of use, but they may not always know or value the more sophisticated, innovative features that may differentiate your product. This can lead to a product that's optimally designed for existing user needs but not with the wow-factor or advanced functionality that can make it a market leader. You can end up with something "nice" but not something revolutionary.
3. Time-consuming
Continuous interaction with users seems wonderful in theory, but it's also time-consuming. Gathering feedback, reading responses, and making changes based on what you have learned is a continuous process. And while you wait for users to provide their feedback, you won't be working on new features. In other instances, by the time you do manage to act on feedback, the market has changed, and you are trying to catch up. Wading at the pace of user feedback can at times feel like moving through molasses.
4. Limited space for bold innovation
Here's an idea: if you are continuously listening to what users tell you they need, where is there room for actual innovation? Users are good at telling you what's broken in a product or what would make their life simpler. But they can't always foresee the next big something, and they might not even know what they actually want until they experience it. The greatest innovations—such as the iPhone or the first Dyson vacuum—were not created through customer requests. They were created through visionary, cutting-edge thinking. By only thinking about feedback and customer demands, you run the risk of strangling creativity and not pushing the boundaries with something revolutionary. It's akin to asking someone to create the car of their dreams and then not building anything without an engine—they may not know they want the tech-enabled electric car of tomorrow, but you can be sure they'll adore it when it's in front of them.
Product-centric vs user-centric: Key differences
A product development approach can be either product-driven or customer-centric, depending on what the customer prefers. Both approaches aim to ensure quality products and improve customer satisfaction. However, there are numerous key differences, which we have mentioned below.
Decision-making
In a product-focused business, the decisions tend to be dictated by the internal vision, knowledge, and technological expertise of the company. Basically, the product development team will say, "This is what we can do best, and people want it because it's great." It's based on what the company feels will make the product stand out against competition, largely due to their own technological innovations or special features. Though this is wonderful in theory, it can also result in over-engineering or producing something the market does not necessarily require, because technology for the sake of technology is not always the solution.
Conversely, user-focused businesses make decisions with one thing in mind: the users. Their way of thinking is all about knowing users' needs, behaviours, and feedback. Rather than using internal assumptions alone, the businesses here pay attention to actual-world feedback in the form of surveys, interviews, and hands-on interaction. It is more about building something that addresses actual issues for actual people rather than pushing technology to the limits for the sake of it. It's a more responsive model, ensuring that the final product aligns with what users really need and want.
Innovation vs usability
Product-centric companies emphasise technological innovation. They are always striving for the newest, most advanced features, even when customers haven't explicitly asked for them. The logic here is: "If we create something innovative and better, the market will come to us in the end." Many times, these products feature flashy bells and whistles, but if they don't explicitly solve the user's pain points, they may flop.
Conversely, the user-centric model turns that on its head. Usability is the priority. In this case, the aim is to create products that are simple to use, intuitive, and address particular user issues. Innovation does come into play, but it's more about enhancing the user experience than about throwing a load of flashy features in there that may not necessarily have a genuine purpose. Consider it as seriously taking the user's experience into account, ensuring the journey is smooth, clear, and effective. Users do not necessarily have an interest in complicated technology unless it simplifies their lives or their work becomes quicker. Thus, the attention is solely about making the product seamlessly integrate with their requirements.
Time-to-market
Product-oriented firms have longer product development lifecycles. Why? Because they are dedicated to refining every minute detail, incorporating advanced technology, and ensuring the product is as refined as it can be prior to release. Perfectionism is a double-edged sword in that it can lead to a superbly refined product, but it also translates to slower time-to-market. By the time they finally launch the product, the world may have already shifted to something else, or the competition may have gotten there first.
User-centric businesses, by contrast, use agile development methodologies, which enable them to put products in front of users faster. Here, the goal isn't perfection immediately; it's to launch a minimal viable product (MVP), get actual user feedback, and iterate from there. It's all about ongoing improvement through quick iterations of testing and honing. This rapid feedback cycle enables quicker adjustment to the needs of the market, hence products can be developed in real time. In other words, the emphasis is on getting it out early, learning quickly, and adapting in response.
Success criteria
In a product-centric approach, the primary objective is to develop something novel with sophisticated features or technology that differentiates it. The rationale is: "If we produce the best product we can, customers will eventually see its worth and come in droves." This can be a miracle worker, but it can also take longer to come, as customers may not immediately appreciate the value of the product or simply just not be ready for it.
For user-centric businesses, the yardstick of success is far more down-to-earth. It's about user satisfaction, adoption, and the product's fit with the market. Rather than pinning their hopes on groundbreaking features, user-centric businesses rely on solving actual problems. If users perceive that the product truly enhances their lives and serves their purposes, they will adopt it and use it.
A product development approach can be either product-driven or customer-centric, depending on what the customer prefers. Both approaches aim to ensure quality products and improve customer satisfaction. However, there are numerous key differences, which we have mentioned below.
Decision-making
In a product-focused business, the decisions tend to be dictated by the internal vision, knowledge, and technological expertise of the company. Basically, the product development team will say, "This is what we can do best, and people want it because it's great." It's based on what the company feels will make the product stand out against competition, largely due to their own technological innovations or special features. Though this is wonderful in theory, it can also result in over-engineering or producing something the market does not necessarily require, because technology for the sake of technology is not always the solution.
Conversely, user-focused businesses make decisions with one thing in mind: the users. Their way of thinking is all about knowing users' needs, behaviours, and feedback. Rather than using internal assumptions alone, the businesses here pay attention to actual-world feedback in the form of surveys, interviews, and hands-on interaction. It is more about building something that addresses actual issues for actual people rather than pushing technology to the limits for the sake of it. It's a more responsive model, ensuring that the final product aligns with what users really need and want.
Innovation vs usability
Product-centric companies emphasise technological innovation. They are always striving for the newest, most advanced features, even when customers haven't explicitly asked for them. The logic here is: "If we create something innovative and better, the market will come to us in the end." Many times, these products feature flashy bells and whistles, but if they don't explicitly solve the user's pain points, they may flop.
Conversely, the user-centric model turns that on its head. Usability is the priority. In this case, the aim is to create products that are simple to use, intuitive, and address particular user issues. Innovation does come into play, but it's more about enhancing the user experience than about throwing a load of flashy features in there that may not necessarily have a genuine purpose. Consider it as seriously taking the user's experience into account, ensuring the journey is smooth, clear, and effective. Users do not necessarily have an interest in complicated technology unless it simplifies their lives or their work becomes quicker. Thus, the attention is solely about making the product seamlessly integrate with their requirements.
Time-to-market
Product-oriented firms have longer product development lifecycles. Why? Because they are dedicated to refining every minute detail, incorporating advanced technology, and ensuring the product is as refined as it can be prior to release. Perfectionism is a double-edged sword in that it can lead to a superbly refined product, but it also translates to slower time-to-market. By the time they finally launch the product, the world may have already shifted to something else, or the competition may have gotten there first.
User-centric businesses, by contrast, use agile development methodologies, which enable them to put products in front of users faster. Here, the goal isn't perfection immediately; it's to launch a minimal viable product (MVP), get actual user feedback, and iterate from there. It's all about ongoing improvement through quick iterations of testing and honing. This rapid feedback cycle enables quicker adjustment to the needs of the market, hence products can be developed in real time. In other words, the emphasis is on getting it out early, learning quickly, and adapting in response.
Success criteria
In a product-centric approach, the primary objective is to develop something novel with sophisticated features or technology that differentiates it. The rationale is: "If we produce the best product we can, customers will eventually see its worth and come in droves." This can be a miracle worker, but it can also take longer to come, as customers may not immediately appreciate the value of the product or simply just not be ready for it.
For user-centric businesses, the yardstick of success is far more down-to-earth. It's about user satisfaction, adoption, and the product's fit with the market. Rather than pinning their hopes on groundbreaking features, user-centric businesses rely on solving actual problems. If users perceive that the product truly enhances their lives and serves their purposes, they will adopt it and use it.
Examples of product centric vs user-centric product development
There are many product-centric and user-centric companies. Some focus on developing and improving products without giving too much attention to users' needs, while others focus on gaining an edge in the market and building a loyal customer base. Some of the best examples are mentioned below.
Real-World Examples
There are many product-centric and user-centric companies. Some focus on developing and improving products without giving too much attention to users' needs, while others focus on gaining an edge in the market and building a loyal customer base. Some of the best examples are mentioned below.
Sonos (Product-Centric)
No one was calling for Sonos when they introduced their home sound solutions initially. Audiophiles were happy with their high-fidelity, high-end sound systems, and the common man was happy with their low-fidelity clock radios or boomboxes. Sonos didn't wait around for the marketplace to call for a superior product; they developed a need. By providing simple, inexpensive streaming that could be listened to in any room, they simplified home audio and made it available even to non-enthusiasts. But here's the twist: when people learned how it worked, either at a friend's or through a demo, they realised how much they were missing out. Sonos didn't merely sell speakers, they invented a category. Each time they launched a new product, they set the bar higher and generated a need for smart speakers that individuals didn't even realise they had until they used them.
IKEA (User-Centric)
IKEA is a company that comes to mind when people think of user-centric design. They don't sell furniture, they sell solutions that can be customised to accommodate a vast array of lifestyles and rooms. IKEA modular products enable individuals to modify solutions to fit special needs and taste, adding the dimension of personalisation and proprietorship to the process. Prefer a bed-like couch? No worries, IKEA's on it. Desiring bookcases that can house books in the compact apartment setting? There is a solution to that as well. But that is not enough for IKEA. They've got the user experience spot on with things such as step-by-step instructions for assembly and all the tools needed to assemble the things, ensuring that each piece is accessible to everyone. Not surprising that it's a favorite among those who seek low-cost furniture without sacrificing aesthetics.
Dyson (Product-Centric)
Dyson is another product-driven giant that demonstrates the strength of innovation. When they initially entered the market with their bagless vacuum cleaners, no one was pounding on the door demanding one. But Dyson wasn't going to play it safe. With their state-of-the-art research and development, they produced a vacuum that not only cleaned better but also appeared and functioned in an entirely new manner. Their vacuum was so superior that others would pay a premium to get it, and they didn't stop there. Dyson moved into fans, air purifiers, and even hairdryers, always striving to redefine form and function. Yes, would-be copies like SharkNinja attempted to follow their success, but Dyson retains its throne by relentlessly innovating.
Zappos (User-Centric)
Zappos, however, goes user-centric one step further. Shopping for shoes online was once a nightmare. You couldn't try them on, so there was always that pesky doubt: "Will they fit? Will I like the way they look? " Zappos broke the code by eliminating one of the largest hassles: returns. Their free return policy made it simple for customers to purchase shoes, try them on at home, and if they didn't fit or just didn't feel quite right, they could return them with no hassle. But it's not merely returns. Zappos hears from its customers—continuously seeking feedback, fine-tuning its user experience, and changing its offerings to better serve the customer. This user research obsession has enabled Zappos to cultivate an army of repeat customers who return for that seamless, painless experience.
There are many product-centric and user-centric companies. Some focus on developing and improving products without giving too much attention to users' needs, while others focus on gaining an edge in the market and building a loyal customer base. Some of the best examples are mentioned below.
Real-World Examples
There are many product-centric and user-centric companies. Some focus on developing and improving products without giving too much attention to users' needs, while others focus on gaining an edge in the market and building a loyal customer base. Some of the best examples are mentioned below.
Sonos (Product-Centric)
No one was calling for Sonos when they introduced their home sound solutions initially. Audiophiles were happy with their high-fidelity, high-end sound systems, and the common man was happy with their low-fidelity clock radios or boomboxes. Sonos didn't wait around for the marketplace to call for a superior product; they developed a need. By providing simple, inexpensive streaming that could be listened to in any room, they simplified home audio and made it available even to non-enthusiasts. But here's the twist: when people learned how it worked, either at a friend's or through a demo, they realised how much they were missing out. Sonos didn't merely sell speakers, they invented a category. Each time they launched a new product, they set the bar higher and generated a need for smart speakers that individuals didn't even realise they had until they used them.
IKEA (User-Centric)
IKEA is a company that comes to mind when people think of user-centric design. They don't sell furniture, they sell solutions that can be customised to accommodate a vast array of lifestyles and rooms. IKEA modular products enable individuals to modify solutions to fit special needs and taste, adding the dimension of personalisation and proprietorship to the process. Prefer a bed-like couch? No worries, IKEA's on it. Desiring bookcases that can house books in the compact apartment setting? There is a solution to that as well. But that is not enough for IKEA. They've got the user experience spot on with things such as step-by-step instructions for assembly and all the tools needed to assemble the things, ensuring that each piece is accessible to everyone. Not surprising that it's a favorite among those who seek low-cost furniture without sacrificing aesthetics.
Dyson (Product-Centric)
Dyson is another product-driven giant that demonstrates the strength of innovation. When they initially entered the market with their bagless vacuum cleaners, no one was pounding on the door demanding one. But Dyson wasn't going to play it safe. With their state-of-the-art research and development, they produced a vacuum that not only cleaned better but also appeared and functioned in an entirely new manner. Their vacuum was so superior that others would pay a premium to get it, and they didn't stop there. Dyson moved into fans, air purifiers, and even hairdryers, always striving to redefine form and function. Yes, would-be copies like SharkNinja attempted to follow their success, but Dyson retains its throne by relentlessly innovating.
Zappos (User-Centric)
Zappos, however, goes user-centric one step further. Shopping for shoes online was once a nightmare. You couldn't try them on, so there was always that pesky doubt: "Will they fit? Will I like the way they look? " Zappos broke the code by eliminating one of the largest hassles: returns. Their free return policy made it simple for customers to purchase shoes, try them on at home, and if they didn't fit or just didn't feel quite right, they could return them with no hassle. But it's not merely returns. Zappos hears from its customers—continuously seeking feedback, fine-tuning its user experience, and changing its offerings to better serve the customer. This user research obsession has enabled Zappos to cultivate an army of repeat customers who return for that seamless, painless experience.
Which approach should you choose?
In truth, most successful brands mix the two—pulling from user insights to build products that still push boundaries. If you go fully product-centric, you risk building a masterpiece no one asked for. If you go fully user-centric, you might only produce marginal upgrades rather than genuine innovation.
Ultimately, ask yourself:
What’s my business goal? Rapid adoption? Revenue from niche tech lovers?
Who’s my audience? Are they open to new gadgetry, or do they want something tried-and-true?
What’s the competition up to? Is the market full of me-too products, leaving room for major disruption?
A balanced mindset—where you emphasise advanced features but also keep tabs on user feedback—often yields the best results.
In truth, most successful brands mix the two—pulling from user insights to build products that still push boundaries. If you go fully product-centric, you risk building a masterpiece no one asked for. If you go fully user-centric, you might only produce marginal upgrades rather than genuine innovation.
Ultimately, ask yourself:
What’s my business goal? Rapid adoption? Revenue from niche tech lovers?
Who’s my audience? Are they open to new gadgetry, or do they want something tried-and-true?
What’s the competition up to? Is the market full of me-too products, leaving room for major disruption?
A balanced mindset—where you emphasise advanced features but also keep tabs on user feedback—often yields the best results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Apple product-centric or customer-centric?
Apple uses product-centric and user-centric approaches to understand users' needs, desires, and pain points. Its approach is based on introducing products that no one had ever dreamed of before and refining user experience by obsessing over every detail and pushing the product specifications to offer top-of-the-line options at a premium price.
What are the three principles of product development?
The product development process involves different steps that can vary with each company, and the following are three main pillars that help the product be sustained.
Product management
Product engineering
What is the user-centric design?
It’s a philosophy where user needs and preferences shape every decision, from concept to final UI. The objective is intuitive, friction-free interactions that solve real problems.
Final Thoughts
At the end of the day, your product and your users are inseparable pieces of the same puzzle. Even the sleekest gadget or app will bomb if it doesn’t actually solve a real problem, just as the most intuitive user experience can’t save a half-baked product. The sweet spot? Bringing together both approaches—aligning your fresh ideas with users’ real needs—to create a brand that stands out for quality and relevance. By balancing product-centric excellence and user-centric insight, you’ll be able to innovate without losing sight of what your audience genuinely values.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Apple product-centric or customer-centric?
Apple uses product-centric and user-centric approaches to understand users' needs, desires, and pain points. Its approach is based on introducing products that no one had ever dreamed of before and refining user experience by obsessing over every detail and pushing the product specifications to offer top-of-the-line options at a premium price.
What are the three principles of product development?
The product development process involves different steps that can vary with each company, and the following are three main pillars that help the product be sustained.
Product management
Product engineering
What is the user-centric design?
It’s a philosophy where user needs and preferences shape every decision, from concept to final UI. The objective is intuitive, friction-free interactions that solve real problems.
Final Thoughts
At the end of the day, your product and your users are inseparable pieces of the same puzzle. Even the sleekest gadget or app will bomb if it doesn’t actually solve a real problem, just as the most intuitive user experience can’t save a half-baked product. The sweet spot? Bringing together both approaches—aligning your fresh ideas with users’ real needs—to create a brand that stands out for quality and relevance. By balancing product-centric excellence and user-centric insight, you’ll be able to innovate without losing sight of what your audience genuinely values.
Work with us
Click to copy
work@for.co
- FOR® Brand. FOR® Future.
We’re remote-first — with strategic global hubs
Click to copy
Helsinki, FIN
info@for.fi
Click to copy
New York, NY
ny@for.co
Click to copy
Miami, FL
mia@for.co
Click to copy
Dubai, UAE
uae@for.co
Click to copy
Kyiv, UA
kyiv@for.co
Click to copy
Lagos, NG
lagos@for.ng
Copyright © 2024 FOR®
Work with us
Click to copy
work@for.co
- FOR® Brand. FOR® Future.
We’re remote-first — with strategic global hubs
Click to copy
Helsinki, FIN
info@for.fi
Click to copy
New York, NY
ny@for.co
Click to copy
Miami, FL
mia@for.co
Click to copy
Dubai, UAE
uae@for.co
Click to copy
Kyiv, UA
kyiv@for.co
Click to copy
Lagos, NG
lagos@for.ng
Copyright © 2024 FOR®
Work with us
Click to copy
work@for.co
We’re remote-first — with strategic global hubs
Click to copy
Helsinki, FIN
hel@for.co
Click to copy
New York, NY
ny@for.co
Click to copy
Miami, FL
mia@for.co
Click to copy
Dubai, UAE
uae@for.co
Click to copy
Kyiv, UA
kyiv@for.co
Click to copy
Lagos, NG
lagos@for.ng
Copyright © 2024 FOR®